21 Jul 2022
吳隨有 訴 律政司司長
- Citation
- [2022] HKSCT 3
- Court
- Small Claims Tribunal
- Case number
- SCTC20434/2020
Applicants failed to discharge the evidential burden to prove the value of their losses or any mental distress. The tribunal correctly refused to treat a post-judgment invoice as proof and properly exercised its limited investigatory duty under s16(3). The award of HKD100 as symbolic damages was lawful and will not be disturbed.