27 Nov 2006
昆明預應力制管廠 v. TRUE STAND INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- 昆明預應力制管廠 v. TRUE STAND INVESTMENTS LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT67/2005
The application to set aside the ex parte order and judgment was dismissed because none of the respondent's grounds fell within the limited statutory grounds in section 40E: the name variance did not defeat the arbitration agreement as the tribunal was the authorised body intended by the parties; non-possession or non-disclosure of documents did not render the respondent unable to present its case; public policy and fraud exceptions were not engaged; and merits issues (liability and quantum) cannot be re-opened on enforcement. Consequently the Mainland award stands and is enforceable against…