22 Nov 2013
SINGH JUGRAJ v. WAVE STEP LTD
- Citation
- SINGH JUGRAJ v. WAVE STEP LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2637/2010
Judge found on credibility and contemporaneous documentation that the alleged oral representations were not established; even if made, plaintiff did not reasonably rely on them; ostensible authority of agent existed only in potential but was immaterial; no duty to disclose alleged illegal cockloft where premises let 'as is'; plaintiff’s claim dismissed; defendant’s counterclaim for unpaid rent, repair and loss of rental income succeeds and after set-off judgment entered for defendant in sum HK$112,000 plus interest and costs.