12 Aug 2010
HARTANTO HADY v. RADNAABAZAR BAZAR
- Citation
- HARTANTO HADY v. RADNAABAZAR BAZAR
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA89/2008
Service was invalid because the mode of service did not conform to the modes prescribed by Hong Kong law for service outside the jurisdiction and did not satisfy Mongolian law (Article 77.2); the affidavit did not contain the required statements for postal service under Order 10(1)(2); accordingly the default judgment was set aside and costs ordered nisi.