11 Mar 2011
LAU CHI WING v. NG KA HI
- Citation
- LAU CHI WING v. NG KA HI
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1689/2010
The Defence discloses an arguable defence because, on proper construction of the Agreement as a whole, clause 18/Fourth Schedule is silent as to the fate of deposits when the mortgage contingency is triggered and it is arguable that the amounts described as deposits may be forfeited on the purchaser's failure to complete; accordingly there are triable issues and summary judgment and striking out must be refused.