1 Nov 2019
V, RHM v. V, ES also known as B, ES
- Citation
- [2019] HKFC 279
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC10499/2018
Both consent summonses were set aside because the respondent did not enter them with a full appreciation of their implications due to material lack of financial disclosure and inadequate independent legal advice, compounded by inappropriate pressure and the respondent’s stressed emotional state; additionally the Amended Consent Summons contained unclear and arguably unenforceable provisions and risked prejudicing the reasonable requirements of the children, making it unfair to hold the parties to the agreements.