18 Sept 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 黃國偉
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 黃國偉
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA96/2012
The trial judge correctly concluded on the totality of circumstantial evidence and the appellant's admissions that 昌盛 and 兩益 operated with sufficient commonality to constitute acting for or conspiring with the lender within s29(10) Cap.163; the judge properly assessed the caution interview and the only sustainable inference was guilt, so the conviction is upheld.