30 Sept 2021
郭浩良 對 趙慧賢及另五人
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 2822
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL740/2021
Leave refused because the applicant failed to show a real prospect of success: the termination decision became academic after the Ombudsman reopened investigations on an alternative proof of address; the written‑communication measure was within the Ombudsman's statutory procedural powers and not Wednesbury‑unreasonable or procedurally unfair; identity and authenticity allegations were speculative and unsupported.