8 Sept 1999
MA MEI TI v. TSE SUI LUEN
- Citation
- MA MEI TI v. TSE SUI LUEN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA4676/1999
On the true construction of the Deeds the notices did not need to specify a calendar completion date; the Served Notices expressly referenced the contractual timing (the 14th day after service) and the stated calendar date was an obvious clerical error; applying the objective construction principles in Mannai, the notices were valid and entitled the Plaintiffs to specific performance.