12 Nov 2010
YEN WING CHOI AND OTHERS v. MATCH POWER INVESTMENT LTD
- Citation
- YEN WING CHOI AND OTHERS v. MATCH POWER INVESTMENT LTD
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV5/2010
The Court held the Settlement Agreement, read in its factual matrix, was concerned with exercise of the $1 car parking space option and associated formalities and did not operate as a 'full and final settlement' of the purchasers' rights under the sale and purchase agreements including claims for interest and delay; literal all‑encompassing reading was absurd and the doctrines of non est factum and mistake did not render the document void.