18 Jul 2005
TIKEN LTD AND ANOTHER v. BIL INTERNATIONAL LTD
- Citation
- TIKEN LTD AND ANOTHER v. BIL INTERNATIONAL LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCL87/2000
The court held that the dominant wording 'all of the contractual and corporate joint ventures' evinced an intention to include all existing joint ventures and that the reference to Schedule 3 was a falsa demonstratio; accordingly the TKCJV was a Joint Venture and the Ting Kau Bridge Contract fell within the Zero Margin Contracts clause of the Acquisition Agreement, the alleged oral settlement was not a binding discharge, and judgment was entered for the plaintiffs.