28 Aug 2024
蔡翠珍 對 盧浩強
- Citation
- [2024] HKCFI 2648
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCSA48/2024
The Recorder's factual finding that the applicant failed to prove the alleged oral promise was supported by contemporaneous documents (two signed receipts stating the new tenancy was for two years) and by the applicant's own timeline showing payments preceded the alleged promise; the Recorder's exclusion of an unstamped lease and assessment of credibility were not erroneous; therefore the application for leave to appeal raised no arguable point of law and is dismissed.