28 Jul 2011
GURUNG, TANUJA v. LILBURN, ARLENE
- Citation
- GURUNG, TANUJA v. LILBURN, ARLENE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP616/2011
The Plaintiff had prior and continuous possession superior in time to the Defendant, evidenced by earlier payment of rates, ongoing occupation and acknowledgement in the tenancy; the appellant's asserted authority from the Rating and Valuation Department and other defences were unsustainable; fresh affidavits were inadmissible for lack of special grounds; therefore the appeal under Order 113 fails and vacant possession is to be restored to the Plaintiff.