27 Feb 2026
徐立斌及另一人 對 鍾灼偉
- Citation
- [2026] HKDC 341
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ1218/2024
Leave to appeal refused because the defendant's grounds challenged the trial judge's factual findings without showing a reasonable prospect that such findings were plainly wrong; plaintiffs established, on the balance of probabilities, that the Order 22 settlement proposal was received and not accepted within 28 days and plaintiffs obtained a better result at trial, entitling them to costs from the expiry of the offer (indemnity basis for the costs summons) and interest on the special damages at the specified rates; interest on indemnity costs was refused due to lack of particulars of solicit…