27 Apr 2022
TSANG HIN YI HUBERT v. CHEUNG LAI PING
- Citation
- [2022] HKDC 366
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCMP3110/2018
The court found the Judgment to be more advantageous to the plaintiff than the sanctioned offer, rejected the defendant's arguments that the offer was tactical or that it would be unjust to apply rule 24 given the timing and information available, and therefore varied the costs order nisi to award indemnity costs from 21 February 2019, interest at 4.5% per annum on those costs to the date of judgment, and indemnity taxation for the costs of this application.