21 Jul 2004
GUANGZHOU GREEN-ENHAN BIO-ENGINEERING CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. GREEN POWER HEALTH PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- GUANGZHOU GREEN-ENHAN BIO-ENGINEERING CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. GREEN POWER HEALTH PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP74/2004
Under Order 24 Rule 10 the plaintiffs were required to produce only the parts of the diary that contained entries referred to in the witness statement; irrelevant parts may be sealed; documents produced under Rule 10 are voluntary and do not attract the implied undertaking; exercise of discretion to order wider inspection was refused because defendants delayed making the application, failed to show sufficient necessity or relevance for broader inspection, and wider inspection would cause prejudice and derail the tightly managed trial timetable.