14 Jan 2008
AKHTAR MAHMOOD v. CHUN WO-HENRYVICY-CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION JOINT VENTURE
- Citation
- AKHTAR MAHMOOD v. CHUN WO-HENRYVICY-CHINA RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION JOINT VENTURE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI336/2007
Application dismissed because plaintiff failed to establish the three pre-requisites for discovery under Order 24 rule 7: insufficient evidence that the documents exist, insufficient showing that the documents relate to matters in issue, and insufficient evidence that the documents were in the possession, custody or power of the defendant; additional discretionary refusal because many items were irrelevant or speculative and some documents were located in Taiwan and not shown to be controlled by defendant.