6 Jul 2004
MAXON INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. SINO LEADER (ASIA) LTD
- Citation
- MAXON INVESTMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. SINO LEADER (ASIA) LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2332/2003
The defendant was found to have sufficient present control and use of the premises (locked gate, staff, assertions of possession and failure to deliver possession) such that the second pre-condition of Order 29 r 12(b) was satisfied; consequently interim payment was justified, the defendant's counterclaim did not show sufficient strength to reduce payment, and the appeal was dismissed with specified interim payment orders.