2 May 2008
PICO INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD v. PALACE DREAMS LTD
- Citation
- PICO INTERNATIONAL (HK) LTD v. PALACE DREAMS LTD
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ507/2007
The amendment under Order 20 rule 11 was refused because the order of 10 October 2007 expressly referred to and was granted on the terms of Order 49B, matching the draft order and the application; this was not a clerical slip or mechanical error and the court therefore would not correct the order or exercise inherent jurisdiction to substitute Order 48.