1 Jun 2000
CHOI YAT YING v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC
- Citation
- CHOI YAT YING v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCPI721/1999
Where a defendant was notified that an irregular payment into court would be treated as exclusive of costs unless the defendant replied within a short period, the defendant's silence in those special circumstances amounted to acquiescence/estoppel and rectified the irregularity; the payment was therefore capable of acceptance and triggered entitlement to costs under Order 62, rule 10, so the defendant's appeal was dismissed.