6 May 2011
RAI PABITDARA v. VEGETABLE MARKETING ORGANIZATION
- Citation
- RAI PABITDARA v. VEGETABLE MARKETING ORGANIZATION
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCPI2473/2009
The court varied the costs order: indemnity costs and enhanced interest were justified under Order 22 r.23 because the plaintiff failed to beat the sanctioned payments; indemnity costs run from 16 July 2010 (expiry of acceptance period of the 2nd sanctioned payment); enhanced interest set at 4.5% pre-judgment and 9% post-judgment; leave to appeal refused for lack of realistic prospect of success and dismissed with costs and Certificate for Counsel.