26 Jun 2023
SZETO KWOK HUNG ROQUE v. SZETO KWOK KWONG BERNARD AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2023] HKCFI 1687
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP2596/2017
Because the plaintiff, having changed his address for service to a serviced apartment, had vacated that address and failed to provide a new address for service, he effectively had no address for service and Order 65 rule 9 applied; therefore the taxation documents did not require personal service and no irregularity arose, making the defendants' application unnecessary and service of the present summons and supporting affirmation dispensable.