23 Feb 2017
U v. A AND OTHERS
- Citation
- U v. A AND OTHERS
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCT34/2016
The court held the respondents were afforded a fair hearing despite the arbitrator declining to admit the Fuzhou judgment; the tribunal's determination that the PAC and addenda were effective and that the claim to appoint the chairman fell within the scope of the reference was within the arbitrator's jurisdiction and not reviewable on enforcement; enforcement would not offend Hong Kong public policy and it would not be just to refuse enforcement on grounds based on PRC law or forum non conveniens; material non-disclosure and payment arguments did not vitiate the ex parte leave to enforce.