8 Mar 2013
LI XIAO YUN AND ANOTHER v. CHINA GAS HOLDINGS LTD
- Citation
- LI XIAO YUN AND ANOTHER v. CHINA GAS HOLDINGS LTD
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCCL18/2011
Leave to adduce further expert evidence was properly refused because the proposed evidence was of dubious and at best slight relevance (Circular 7 post-dated the events), the plaintiffs knew the issues since October 2011 and failed to comply with directions, the application was made at the eve of trial and would prejudice case management and trial efficiency; no demonstrable error of law or misapplication of relevant factors by the trial judge justified appellate interference.