28 Feb 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 林翠雯及另一人
- Citation
- [2025] HKCA 219
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC16/2023
The Court held that although the trial judge made some inaccuracies in summarising particular observations and may have conflated identification of the thrower, his overall credibility assessment and inferences—that the applicants, by remaining in the violent scene in matching attire and acting consistently with other demonstrators, intended to and did participate in the riot—were open on the evidence. Those errors were not material to the safety of conviction; therefore the convictions and sentences were upheld.