14 May 1992
LI MING ON v. LUCKY APPLE LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LI MING ON v. LUCKY APPLE LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMP1084/1992
Clause 5(d)(ii) does not render the defendants' title bad because it only operates where an undivided share or interest has been created; division of Lot 1009 into sections was permissible given payment of the additional premium under Clause 5(a)/(c). However, the plaintiff was entitled to object to title on grounds of the pool's uncertain legal status, the lack of regulated inter se rights between section owners creating unacceptable uncertainty, and the suspicious disposition under the power of attorney because the evidence does not dispel concern about an undervalue sale.