26 Mar 2018
黃碩雄 對 范荏愷
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 168
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV127/2017
The appeals were dismissed because the pleaded causes of action lacked legal foundation or necessary elements: no statutory basis for age discrimination; procuring breach/economic tort not established (no termination by management and no loss shown); alleged harassment did not meet required repetitive and distress-causing elements; statements and evidence used in court proceedings are protected by privilege; privacy claims under the PDPO are procedurally and substantively inappropriate for the High Court and much of the material was exempt under s60B — therefore the strike-out orders below we…