6 Dec 2018
MEHUL GIRISHBHAI TANNA v. AVIJIT NAYAK
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 2683
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA1335/2018
The defendant improperly sought to require the plaintiff to plead evidence rather than material facts contrary to Order 18 rule 7; the Statement of Claim pleaded sufficient particulars for the claim; the alleged oral agreement related to distribution of cash and not the sale or disposition of land, so s3 Cap 219 did not apply; accordingly the strike out application failed and must be dismissed with costs.