28 Feb 2025
香港特別行政區 訴 余亮
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 1810
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA385/2024
The appellate court, after reviewing the CCTV and witness evidence and finding the appellant's explanations inconsistent and implausible, upheld the trial judge's acceptance of the prosecution case and concluded the theft was proven beyond reasonable doubt; conviction and sentence were therefore affirmed.