4 Aug 2004
HKSAR v. LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- HKSAR v. LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC220/2002
The trial judge's directions on possession, knowledge and trafficking were adequate; disclosure of prior convictions was lawful because both defendants gave evidence against each other; omissions in standard jury formulae and fuller Walton‑type explanation were not material on these facts; convictions of both applicants are upheld; sentencing disparity for Law was unjustified and his sentences on the two counts should run concurrently, reducing his total term to 22 years.