29 Jun 2012
香港特別行政區 訴 周瑞麟
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 周瑞麟
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA701/2011
The conviction was quashed because the trial judge failed to address and decide the essential element that the appellant was the person who stored the drugs (actus reus), wrongly treated knowledge as an affirmative defence rather than an element the prosecution must prove, and therefore the conviction was unsafe.