7 Jul 2004
SIEGFRIED ADALBERT UNRUH v. HANS-JOERG SEEBERGER AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- SIEGFRIED ADALBERT UNRUH v. HANS-JOERG SEEBERGER AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA6641/2000
The judge refused to recuse because the decisive finding that ESCT was under the unfettered control of Egana was based on evidence supplied by the defendants themselves and public records, not solely on plaintiff material; the ruling addressed a discrete interlocutory issue (control for discovery), avoided any assessment of witness credibility, and defendants had the opportunity to present affidavits but chose not to; therefore a fair‑minded informed observer would not perceive a real possibility of bias.