19 Apr 2018
CKK v. CKF AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2018] HKFC 53
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC1556/2014
Petitioner demonstrated a good arguable case and the balance of convenience favoured preserving the entire compensation held by the third party (4th Respondent) because assets held by a third party risk reducing the matrimonial pool and cannot be regulated later between spouses; therefore the application to vary the injunction was dismissed and the injunction continued over the full amount until determination of the preliminary issues or further court order.