26 Mar 2007
MOHAMMAD MUNIR v. YAU KEI TAK AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- MOHAMMAD MUNIR v. YAU KEI TAK AND ANOTHER
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCEC251/2006
On the balance of probabilities the evidence was insufficient to establish that the Applicant was either an employee or an independent contractor of the 1st Respondent in relation to the Regalia Bay works; consequently the Applicant could not establish liability against the 2nd Respondent and the claim is dismissed; further, the s.24(6) notice requirement must be strictly complied with and cannot be condoned in these circumstances.