18 Jul 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 鄭志賢
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 1737
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA585/2018
The conviction was upheld because objective evidence (video, location outside appellant's land, conduct showing concealment) demonstrated dishonest appropriation with intention to permanently deprive and rebutted the claimed honest belief; the two‑month immediate custodial sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, security impact, lack of remorse and risk of reoffending.