12 Sept 2024
香港特別行政區 訴 李茵茵
- Citation
- [2024] HKCA 860
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACC237/2023
The single-judge refused leave to appeal because the trial judge did not err in principle nor impose a manifestly excessive sentence: the offences were serious, the applicant actively participated in group violence and later disposed of shoes to defeat identification, mitigating factors (including volunteer service and some provocation) were insufficient to outweigh aggravating features, and the totality principle supported the cumulative sentence of five years six months.