22 Nov 2022
庾玉萍及另二人 對 蔡育培經營松健莊及另一人
- Citation
- [2022] HKCFI 3513
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCLA10/2022
The Tribunal's findings that the claimants had passed probation, that wages had been unpaid for over one month, and that s10A of the Employment Ordinance thus operated to treat the contracts as terminated by the employer were supported by the evidence and correct in law; the appellant failed to demonstrate any arguable error of law or excess of jurisdiction and could not introduce new evidence on a leave application, therefore leave to appeal was refused.