Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Prohibition of cidtp (bor art 3)

Legal area

Court

23 Jun 2022

SITI BADRIYAH v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Citation

[2022] HKCFI 1688
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCAL1044/2019

Leave to apply for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any realistic prospect of success; the Board's adverse credibility and fact-findings were lawful, not Wednesbury unreasonable or procedurally unfair, and no error of law was identified.
12 Mar 2021

SANDAL LAKHWINDER SINGH v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD/ NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Citation

[2021] HKCFI 633
Court

Court of First Instance
Case number

HCAL1267/2018

Leave refused because the applicant offered no pleaded grounds or evidence demonstrating an arguable case; the Board's findings that risk was low, state protection was available and internal relocation was viable were not shown to be legally flawed, procedurally unfair or irrational, and therefore there was no reasonable prospect of success on judicial review.