16 Jan 2007
KUK YUK CHING v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
- Citation
- KUK YUK CHING v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL125/2005
The judicial review is dismissed because the disciplinary findings were supported by admissible materials (transcripts and statements), the applicant had accepted the falsity of his representations at the hearing, Regulation 3(2)(m) validly covers off‑duty conduct and is not ultra vires, the FDO acted within the 14‑day framework as construed and did not pre‑determine the penalty, and the substituted punishment was within the rational range and not disproportionate.