16 Sept 1983
LANGCORK LTD v. YAT MING INVESTMENT CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- LANGCORK LTD v. YAT MING INVESTMENT CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA10514/1983
The court held that although plaintiffs had established a good arguable case, the balance of convenience, the passage of time, the vagueness and delay in the claims, and absence of convincing evidence of a real risk of dissipation or removal of identifiable trust funds meant the ex parte Mareva injunctions should not be continued; proprietary injunctions and pre-pleading discovery were not justified on the facts; no material non-disclosure was found to set aside the ex parte orders; Order 44A did not apply.