16 Sept 1983
FONG MING v. YAT MING INVESTMENT CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Citation
- FONG MING v. YAT MING INVESTMENT CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA10014/1983
Although plaintiffs established a good arguable case, on the whole of the evidence there was insufficient real risk of removal or dissipation of assets (and the trust/proprietary claims were weak and delayed) to justify continuation of the ex parte Mareva injunctions; the facts did not warrant interlocutory proprietary injunctions or exceptional pre-pleading discovery; Order 44A relief did not apply.