9 Jul 2019
CK v. TCH
- Citation
- [2019] HKFC 179
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC5240/2011
The Respondent failed to prove either proposed ground for variation: (1) the asserted commercial advantage lacked cogent evidence of increased post-redevelopment value; (2) the alleged obligatory surrender under PRC law was unsupported and documentary notices were found unreliable or inconsistent; combined with Respondent's adverse credibility and history of attempting disposals, the Court concluded variation would risk dissipation and prejudice the Petitioner’s ancillary reliefs. Accordingly the Summons was dismissed and the Mareva injunction continued until final determination of ancillary…