16 Jan 2026
HKSAR v. HUANG RUIFANG (黃瑞芳)
- Citation
- [2026] HKCFA 3
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FACC2/2025
Prosecuting counsel's submissions that highlighted the appellant's choice not to testify and used that choice to undermine her credibility contravened s.54(1)(b) CPO; the breach was a material irregularity not cured by the judge's directions, the proviso to s.83(1) CPO did not apply, and the conviction was therefore quashed with a retrial ordered.