4 Sept 2019
香港特別行政區 訴 司徒翹樂
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2062
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA78/2019
Appeal allowed because there was no evidence of police inducement (no entrapment) but the conviction was unsafe: the trial judge's reasoning contained inconsistent credibility findings and a misapprehension of a caution statement, such that the guilty verdict could not be relied upon; conviction and sentence were quashed.