5 Nov 2003
W v. W
- Citation
- W v. W
- Court
- Family Court
- Case number
- FCMC2348/2002
Assets were insufficient for a clean break; on balance the Wife has greater vulnerability and needs but the Husband's present unemployment and limited immediate liquidity justify nominal maintenance now with substantive maintenance to be reviewed if and when he obtains employment or business income. As practical provision the court ordered transfer of the Husband's interest in specific UK property to the Wife and required ongoing disclosure from the Husband (management accounts every six months and prompt notification of employment); costs to be borne by each party.