15 May 2026
The court allowed the withdrawal because the applicant's sworn affirmation demonstrated the withdrawal was voluntary and informed, including awareness that the Board's decision would remain final and that he could be refouled.
7 May 2026
The court allowed the withdrawal because the applicant's sworn affirmation demonstrated a voluntary and informed decision, including awareness that the Board's decision would remain in force and that she risked refoulement; accordingly leave to apply for judicial review was withdrawn.
7 May 2026
The court was satisfied the applicant withdrew his leave application voluntarily and with understanding of the consequences, including the finality of the Board's decision and the risk of refoulement; accordingly the court allowed the withdrawal and granted leave to withdraw the leave application.
6 May 2026
The application for extension of time was refused because the applicant was six days late, offered no valid or evidentially supported reasons for the delay, and the intended appeal had no realistic prospect of success given the Board's finding that his non-refoulement claim was unsubstantiated.
29 Apr 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to point to specific errors of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Leave Decision; his allegations were general and lacked particulars and therefore did not constitute viable grounds to disturb the judge's refusal of leave.
15 Apr 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any error in the Deputy High Court Judge's refusal of leave to apply for judicial review; general, unparticularised assertions of fear and risk do not amount to viable grounds for overturning a leave refusal, and the Court will not substitute its factual assessment for that of the Board absent legal error or procedural unfairness.
10 Apr 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any viable, particularised grounds identifying error in the Judge's refusal of leave; general assertions about fear if refouled are insufficient and the Court will not revisit the decision‑maker's merits when no proper grounds to reverse the Leave Decision are put forward (applying Nupur Mst).
30 Mar 2026
The applicant failed to identify any specific error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Judge's Leave Decision; his grounds were general, bare and lacking particulars; therefore there was no basis to grant leave or overturn the Leave Decision and the appeal is dismissed.
26 Mar 2026
The court allowed the withdrawal because the applicant’s unchallenged affirmation established that the withdrawal was voluntary, that he understood the finality of the Board’s decision and the risk of refoulement, and therefore it was appropriate to permit withdrawal of the leave application.
19 Mar 2026
The withdrawal application was allowed because the court was satisfied the applicant made the withdrawal of her own free will, understood that the Board’s decision would remain final and binding and that she faced the risk of refoulement; accordingly the court permitted withdrawal of the leave application.