13 Feb 2026
The applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonably arguable public law error in the Board's adverse credibility and factual findings or any error in the Judge's refusal of leave; the Court will not reassess the Board's factual conclusions absent error, therefore the appeal is dismissed.
22 May 2023
Applicant was approximately three weeks late, has no realistic prospect of success because the Board's findings that the claim was unsubstantiated and that state protection/internal relocation were viable stand; accordingly extension of time was refused and the application for leave dismissed.
3 Aug 2018
Leave was refused because there was no reasonably arguable basis for judicial review: the Director and the Adjudicator lawfully and reasonably assessed the claims, afforded the Applicant opportunities to be heard, the Applicant declined to answer questions and advanced no procedural or legal error, therefore no realistic prospect of success for JR.
7 Mar 1990
The court will not substitute its discretion for that of the Immigration Officer but will scrutinize the decision‑making process; here the Removal Notice was a single valid decision, the Immigration Officer acted bona fide and not for extradition purposes, and the applicants' asylum claims were investigated and rejected on credible grounds, so judicial intervention was not warranted.