15 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any substantiated or viable ground demonstrating error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision, and the Court of Appeal, limited to review of the judge's refusal of leave, saw no basis to interfere.
15 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant provided only an unparticularised assertion that his claim was real, failed to identify any error in the judge's refusal of leave, and therefore advanced no viable ground to overturn the order; under established authority the Court will not intervene absent error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality.
15 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to particularise any viable ground to overturn the Deputy High Court Judge's refusal of leave; the grounds filed were general allegations without particulars and did not identify error in the judge's decision, and on that basis the judge's order refusing leave is affirmed.
15 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any viable, substantiated ground to reverse the Deputy High Court Judge's refusal of leave; there was no error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Board's decision.
15 May 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any viable ground to reverse the judge's refusal of leave; the matters raised were bare allegations directed at the Board and Director and did not demonstrate any error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the judge's decision.
30 Apr 2026
The applicant failed to identify or substantiate any error in the judge's decision refusing leave; the grounds advanced were inaccurate and lacked substance; therefore there was no basis to overturn the refusal of leave and the appeal was dismissed.
30 Apr 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to put forward any viable, substantiated grounds of error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality to justify intervention; therefore the Deputy High Court Judge's refusal of leave is upheld and the Court of Appeal will not re-examine the Board's decision on the merits.
16 Apr 2026
The appeal is dismissed because the applicant failed to identify any viable ground to reverse the Judge’s refusal of leave; absent demonstrated error of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality the Court will not substitute its own assessment for the Board, and the applicant waived oral hearing by failing to comply with directions.
15 Apr 2026
The applicant failed to identify or substantiate any error in the judge's decision refusing leave to apply for judicial review; absent viable grounds to reverse that refusal the appeal must be dismissed and the Court will not re-open the Board's merits-based determinations.
30 Mar 2026
The appeal was dismissed because the applicant failed to identify or substantiate any error in the Judge's refusal of leave; absent demonstrated errors of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality, the Court will not interfere with the Board's decision or the Judge's refusal of leave.