5 Apr 2024
黃堅華 對 袁桂馨及另二人
- Citation
- [2024] HKDC 545
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ6050/2018
The court held there was no real prospect of success on appeal because the trial judge's factual findings that the third person was not a party to the lease and that defendants failed to prove authorization or acquiescence were supported by the evidence and not plainly wrong; the defendants had not pleaded or adduced necessary evidence on authorization/acquiescence and bore the burden on those issues; the lease was unregistered and thus not enforceable against the plaintiff purchaser; the valuation report, while not reflecting unusual lease terms, was properly used to assess occupation rent.…