27 Sept 2019
CHENG HUI CHIN v. FUPO INVESTMENTS LTD
- Citation
- [2019] HKCFI 2394
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2487/2014
Court found no reliable evidence that the father made clear irrevocable representations conferring a life interest or licence to occupy; proprietary estoppel and licence claims therefore failed; the informal family tenancies (the two corporate tenancy agreements) were not continued as legally enforceable tenancies after expiry and Hope 88 lacked locus to sue; Fupo and Fook Hong were entitled to possession of Flat 6D and Car Port 3 and mesne profit from dates specified; other procedural and factual uncertainties in Actions 4 and 5 required draft orders to be submitted.